FIPS 140-3 is not a security guarantee, and auditors know it

FIPS-validated modules shipped ROCA, EUCLEAK, Dual_EC_DRBG, and a YubiKey flaw caused by the FIPS self-tests themselves. What the certificate actually attests, what FIPS mode costs in performance, why it breaks Bitcoin tooling like BIP32, and where auditors actually look.
35 points by meehow 78 days ago 808bits.com 21 comments

Summary

FIPS validation has been linked to several significant security flaws, including issues with ROCA and Dual_EC_DRBG. This piece examines the limitations of FIPS certification, its impact on system performance, and how it affects tools like Bitcoin’s BIP32, shedding light on what auditors really focus on during assessments.

Comments (21 of ) ⌛

Loading more comments... ⌛
Scroll down to load more comments
No comments available.
Type to search HN and engineering blog articles
Press Escape to close  |  ↑↓ to navigate  |  Enter to open